« More Joost invitations available | Main | 90% gross margin on FTTH services »

May 09, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c398553ef00d83505c77553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Useful life of various elements of FTTH:

» Lifespan of FTTH network components from Fiberevolution
There's an interesting graph of the useful life of various elements of FTTH over at Brough Turner's Communications blog. Good thing to keep in mind when thinking about investments, costs and the long-term view... [Read More]

» Rates of change from The Yorkshire Ranter
What if the distinction were framed in terms of how long the assets involve last? Consider Brough Turner's graphic dealing with the useful lives of different elements in a telecoms (or isp) network. You'll see that the electronics (routers, switches, m... [Read More]

» Jim Crowe (Level 3) on Why Net Neutrality Legislation is a Bad Idea from Communications
Thanks to Gordon Cook for pointing out remarks Jim Crowe, CEO of Level 3, made at Level 3's Analyst Conference in New York City on March 14th of this year. If you want to listen, it's under Current Issues, Summary [Read More]

» State of the Photon - Global FTTH Activity from Nyquist Capital
Andrew, Is GPON/BPON/GE-PON very relevant? I saw this diagram on Brough Turner’s blog on the FTTH elements - http://blogs.nmss.com/communications/2007/05/useful_life_of_.html. Will this allow operators to move to more mature/ cheaper standards over tim... [Read More]

Comments

Word. It reminds me of another fine way of illustrating the same thing, but using rate of change as the metric. The illustration consisted of concentric circles with RoW in the middle and moving outward with legislation, ducts, dark fiber and active equipement. The circles were drawn as if they were rotating and the speed at each circle's rim being proportional to the rate of change.

I can't for the life of me remember who but it up on his blog, but it was one of the usual suspects.

- Zed

Note that I included "Major Changes in Laws and Regulations" as part of the picture... Here 15 years refers to the average time between FCC "Computer" inquiries and the 1996 Telecom act in the US and 35 years refers to the time lapse between Coase's article on spectrum auctions (1959) and the first auction of radio spectrum (in the US in 1994).

Does this suggest anything about which public sector efforts will be most productive over the coming decades?

Today I received an email, "I really like the graph you've put online for the life span of FTTH elements. What would be the reason for a life span of 20 years for fibre? Will the quality of the glass degrade, through degradation of the crystalic structure?"

No, there is no degradation that I'm aware of. There is, however, functional obsolescence. In the past 15 years, the performance of single mode fiber has improved dramatically -- less loss, more and wider usable wavelength windows, better tolerance to bending and more fibers per square area, not to mention improvements in connectors and splicing technology. My choice of 20 years was based on normal commercial terms to "purchase" exclusive use of one or more fibers in a cable. The typical purchase agreement is a "20 year Indefeasible Right of Use" usually referred to as a "20 year IRU." So even though the fibers continue to work (perhaps indefinitely), at the end of 20 years (perhaps even sooner), it may make sense to increase the utilization of valuable duct space by replacing the fiber cable.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

Search this Blog

Subscribe by Email

August 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Technorati


Site Meter

Upcoming Travel & Conferences


Links

Twitter Feed